I blogged recently about the FRC’s recent report “Effective Company Stewardship: enhancing corporate reporting and audit”. The FRC also gives data showing admittedly lowish levels of outright non-compliance with Companies Act 2006 reporting requirements; although a hefty 32% of accounts examined failed over non-financial KPI’s (Key Performance Indicators). A raw average of 42% of company reports may have complied but were judged to ‘fall short’ on the list below. In view of my previous criticisms, it is noteworthy that whilst 100% of reports complied with requirements in relation to principal risks, a whopping 66% fell short of being adequate. So they supplied the legal boilerplate without giving shareholders adequate information upon which to make judgements.
| | % non-compliant | % falling short |
| Business description | 6 | 52 |
| Strategy | 8 | 44 |
| Principal risks | 0 | 66 |
| Performance and position | 4 | 20 |
| Trends and factors | 6 | 56 |
| Corporate social responsibility | 12 | 34 |
| Contractual arrangements | 12 | 52 |
| Financial KPI’s | 6 | 34 |
| Non-financial KPI’s | 32 | 20 |
No comments:
Post a Comment